Clinical Simulation in health care training: barriers to efficacy and impact on health care safety

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/nds2025390

Keywords:

learning, vocational training, simulation

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical simulation considered as a fundamental tool in the training of health professionals promotes autonomy and preparation for real clinical situations. Therefore, the incorporation of advanced technologies, such as high fidelity simulators and virtual reality, facilitates the transfer of theoretical knowledge to practice, generating an educational experience that is both motivating and effective.
Method: Research with a qualitative approach, with a bibliographic review of original scientific articles in Spanish, English and Portuguese. Thirty studies were selected by convenience sampling, extracted from indexed sources such as Scopus, Scielo and Dialnet. The data collected were organized in an Excel matrix and analyzed using the CASPe critical reading rubric.
Results: Health training faces several challenges, such as the high economic investment in technology, the need for specialized training for instructors and resistance to change on the part of some professionals. However, this methodology contributes significantly to the development of practical skills, improves decision-making in safe environments and fosters collaborative learning.
Conclusion: Clinical simulation is recognized as an essential tool in the training of health professionals, since it provides practical experiences in controlled environments that favor autonomy and preparation for real clinical situations. Worldwide, this methodology has promoted curricular restructuring to improve educational quality and safety, incorporating advanced technologies such as high-fidelity simulators and virtual reality.

References

1. González P, Oltra J, Sitges E, Bonete B. Entrenamiento cognitivo de la memoria de trabajo en adultos mayores con deterioro cognitivo leve. Vitalia. 2020 [acceso 09/04/2025];1(1). Disponible en: https://revistavitalia.org/index.php/vitalia/article/view/124

2. Marijke M, Fiona N, Charmaine B.Simulation-based education for teaching aggression management skills to healthcare providers in acute healthcare settings: A systematic review.International Journal of Nursing Studies.2024 [acceso 09/04/2025];1 (1). Disponible en: https://sciencedirect.puce.elogim.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924001548

3. Guanoluisa J, Pachucho A. Métodos de evaluación en simulación clínica: Revisión sistemática. Revista Científica Arbitrada Investigaciones Salud GESTAR. 2024 [acceso 09/04/2025]; 7 (14). Disponible en: https://journalgestar.org/index.php/gestar/article/view/118

4. Gavilanez A, Paccha J, Bravo M, Cabrera J. Clinical simulation in nursing, challenges, strategies and opportunities for competency development. Salud Cienc Tecnol . 2025 [acceso 09/04/2025]; 5 (1). Disponible en: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/1442

5. López C, Velásquez J, Duarte L, Boetsév A, Rodríguez A. Piloto innovador para el monitoreo de pacientes crónicos en domicilio mediante Internet de las Cosas. Rev Investig Innov Salud. 2024 [acceso15/04/2025];10 (10). Disponible en: https://revistas.sena.edu.co/index.php/rediis/article/view/3793​:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

6. Cedeño M, Cabrera J, Morales I, Jimenez M, Rodríguez J. Percepción docente sobre la simulación clínica en el grado de enfermería en Ecuador. Revista Cubana Enferm. 2024 [acceso 15/04/2025]; 40. Disponible en: https://revenfermeria.sld.cu/index.php/enf/article/view/6421

7. Putza F, Kattana E, Maestre J. Uso de la simulación clínica para entrenar equipos en el manejo de conflictos durante los cuidados en salud: una revisión sistemática exploratoria. Enfermería Clínica. 2022 [acceso16/04/2025]; 32 (1). Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-enfermeria-clinica-35-articulo-uso-simulacion-clinica-entrenar-equipos-S1130862120305337​:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

8. Iñiguez S. Ejercicio en dolor crónico y factores psicológicos. Revisión sistemática. Archivo Venezuela Farmacol Ter. 2021 [acceso16/04/2025]; 40 (1). Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=114032

9. Norvry J, Álvarez O, Martínez F. Simulación clínica y la modelización didáctica en ciencias para la salud. Educación Médica. 2024[acceso16/04/2025]; 25 (1). Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000378

10. López L, Pérez J. Análisis de la tecnología en el aprendizaje. Revista ITS Libertad. 2023 [acceso 23/04/ 2025];18(2). Disponible en: https://revistaitsl.itslibertad.edu.ec/index.php/ITSL/article/view/289

11. Washington, D.C. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Investigación cualitativa en enfermería: contexto y bases conceptuales: OPS; 2008. [acceso 23/04/ 2025]; 2000 (9). Disponible en: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/51581

12. Washington, D.C. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Investigación cualitativa en enfermería: metodología y didáctica.: OPS; 2013[acceso 23/04/ 2025] 2000 (10). Disponible en: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/51587/9789275318171_spa.pdf

13. Najjuma J, Muhumuza A, Santorino D, Sekyere S, Ocheke A, Yiltok S. Barriers and facilitators to interprofessional simulation-based learning in a Ugandan medical school: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2024[accesso 06/05/2025] 25;24(1):1528 .Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-024-06521-9

14. Muhumuza A, Najjuma J, MacIntosh H, Sharma N, Singhal N, Hollaar G. Understanding the barriers and enablers for postgraduate medical trainees becoming simulation educators: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2023 [accesso 06/05/2025]14;23(1):28. Disponible en: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-022-03995-3

15. Lloyd J, Akhtar S, Balaji P. Identifying the barriers faced by medical students using virtual reality simulation. Discover Education. 2023 [accesso 06/05/2025] 25;2(1):26. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-023-00049-8:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

16. Lawaetz J, Soenens G, Eiberg J, Van I, Konge L, Nesbitt C, et al . Facilitators and barriers to implementation of simulation-based education in vascular surgery in Europe. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023. [accesso 06/05/2025] 66(3):428–436. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37330202/

17. Liu B, Zhu X, Zhou Q, Su Y, Qian Y, Ma Z, Gu X, Xia T. Activating ryanodine receptor improves isoflurane-induced cognitive dysfunction. Brain Res Bull. 2023 [accesso 06/05/2025].20;204:110790 Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10481749/

18. Raja VP. Overcoming barriers in simulation-based medical education: challenges and strategic solutions. Indian J Med Spec. 2024. [accesso 13/05/2025] 15(4):211–2. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/imsp/fulltext/2024/15040/overcoming_barriers_in_simulation_based_medical.1.aspx

19. Brown J, Oliveira S, Mitchell C, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of implementing team-based extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulation study: exploratory analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 2025. [accesso 13/05/2025] Jan 24;11:e57424. Disponible en: https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e57424/

20. Adnan M, Noor W, Baig MMA. Risk factors of previously undiagnosed and known untreated hypertension among patients with Type-2 diabetes mellitus. Pak J Med Sci. 2023. [accesso 13/05/2025] 39(2):361-366. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.6329

21. Raja VP. Overcoming barriers in simulation-based medical education: challenges and strategies. Indian J Med Spec. 2024 [accesso 13/05/2025] 15(4):211-212. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/imsp/fulltext/2024/15040/overcoming_barriers_in_simulation_based_medical.1.

22. Gavilanez G, Paccha J, Bravo T, Cabrera J. Clinical simulation in nursing, challenges, strategies and opportunities for competency development. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología. [accesso 13/05/2025] 20255:1442. Disponible en: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/1442

23. Llorente J, Herrera L, Hernández D, Padilla M, PadillaI. Estrés académico en estudiantes de un programa de Enfermería - Montería. Cuidarte Rev Enferm. 2020. [accesso 13/05/2025] 9(18):1-10. Disponible en https://revistas.udes.edu.co/cuidarte/article/view/3679

24. Carballo L, Valladares E, Herrera C. Percepción de los estudiantes de enfermería de UNIBE y UNASA sobre la simulación clínica como alternativa para el logro de los objetivos de aprendizajes, durante la pandemia del COVID-19. Rev Cienc Human Cult. 2025 [accesso 13/05/2025] 10;3(3):35–47. Disponible en https://www.camjol.info/index.php/revistacienciahumanidadycultura/article/view/20150

25. Camargo LM. PEI: incidencia y concordancia con prácticas pedagógicas de docentes y rol de la gestión directiva. Rev Franz Tamayo. 2024 [accesso 14/05/2025] 6(17):28–45. Disponible en https://revistafranztamayo.org/index.php/franztamayo/article/view/1224

26. Dávila A, Vaca J, Hidrobo F. Percepción de los estudiantes de enfermería sobre la simulación clínica: un análisis de su experiencia formativa. Horiz Enferm. 2023 [accesso 14/05/2025] dic;34(3):508–19. Disponible en: https://ojs.uc.cl/index.php/RHE/article/view/65045

27. Mori E, Haruno M. Replyerbrain: a tool for analyzing brain activity during naturalistic social interactions. Hum Brain Mapp. 2022[accesso 14/05/2025] 43(13):4147–4159. Disponible en : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/nop2.1017

28. Arrogante O, González M, López M, Carrión L, Polo A. Comparing formative and summative simulation-based assessment in undergraduate nursing students: nursing competency acquisition and clinical simulation satisfaction. BMC Nurs. 2021[accesso 14/05/2025] 8;20(1):92. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12912-021-00614-2

29. Yusef A, Sanhueza A, Seguel A. Importancia de la simulación clínica en el desarrollo personal y desempeño del estudiante de enfermería. Cienc Enferm. 2021 [accesso 14/05/2025] 9];27. Disponible en: https://revistas.udec.cl/index.php/cienciayenfermeria/article/view/7068

30. González M, Arrogante O, López M, Carrión L, Polo A. Comparación de la evaluación formativa y sumativa basada en simulación en estudiantes de enfermería de pregrado: adquisición de competencias de enfermería y satisfacción con la simulación clínica. BMC Nurs. 2021.[accesso 14/05/2025] 20:92. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0260691720314556

31. Tseng LP, Hou TH, Huang LP, et al. Efectividad de la aplicación de escenarios de simulación clínica e integración de tecnología de la información en cursos de enfermería médico-quirúrgica y crítica. BMC Nurs. 2021.[accesso 14/05/2025] 20:229. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12912-021-00744-7

32. Mohamed T, Harvey G, Favell D. Using exploratory sequential mixed methods design to develop simulation safety practice tool (SSPT). Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2017 [accesso 14/05/2025]; 101. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000210

33. Kim Y, Lee S, Lee H, et al. The Effects of a Simulation-Based Patient Safety Education Program on Compliance with Patient Safety, Perception of Patient Safety Culture, and Educational Satisfaction of Operating Room Nurses. Healthcare. 2023 [accesso 20/05/2025]11(21):2824. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/21/2824

34. Araujo V, Rodríguez A, García A, et al. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in intensive care units in Ecuador: Results from a multicenter study. PLoS One. 2020 [accesso 14/05/2025]14(7. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10025730/

35. González J, Pérez J, González A, et al. Simulación clínica online para estudiantes de ciencias de la salud durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Educ Med. 2023 [accesso 14/05/2025]24(6):10084. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-educacion-medica-71-articulo-simulacion-clinica-online-estudiantes-ciencias-S1575181323000530

36. Piña A, González B, Fruto E. Avances de la simulación clínica en Ecuador. Rev Cient Sinapsis. 2020 [accesso 14/05/2025] 2(11): 128. Disponible en: https://revistas.itsup.edu.ec/index.php/sinapsis/article/view/128

37. Soto V, González J, Pérez J, et al. Simulación clínica en la enseñanza de la enfermería: experiencia de estudiantes en Chile. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2020 [accesso 14/05/2025] 29(spe): e20190295. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/j/tce/a/hz49B6QJrgzmQ4btXm9HYHh/?format=html&lang=es

38. Pacheco L. Enfermedad de Behçet en una niña: reporte de caso. Enfermed Infecc Microbiol. 2024 [accesso 14/05/2025] 44(3) Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=104952

39. Mendieta I, Arnau A, Calderón D, Gea-Izquierdo E. Análisis retrospectivo de perfil microbiológico y resistencia antimicrobiana en infección urinaria pediátrica de hospitales públicos de Quito-Ecuador. Salud Uninorte. 2023[accesso 14/05/2025] 39(1):95-108. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=90519

40. Zhimnay C, Fernández J, Albarracín J, Sádaba I, Sucozhanay D. Mapeo de la producción científica en ciencias sociales en Ecuador. Proceedings. 2020 [accesso 14/05/2025]:9501-9509. Disponible en: https://library.iated.org/view/ZHIMNAYVALVERDE2019MAP

41. Miyao M, Kotani H, Ishida T, Kawai C, Manabe S, et al. Pivotal role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in NAFLD/NASH progression. Lab Invest. 2015 [accesso 14/05/2025] 95(10):1130-1144. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181318303590.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-09

How to Cite

1.
Zambrano Farias LK, Cabrera Olvera JL. Clinical Simulation in health care training: barriers to efficacy and impact on health care safety. Nursing Depths Series [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 9 [cited 2025 Aug. 11];4:390. Available from: https://nds.ageditor.ar/index.php/nds/article/view/390